Repository navigation
docs(consumer): explain rejection of invalid queue metadata - #1063
Merged
Merged
Conversation
sbalabanov
marked this pull request as ready for review
November 10, 2026 21:43
mnoah1
approved these changes
Nov 13, 2026
|
|
1 similar comment
|
|
Summary: Document why invalid queue metadata is logged and rejected without retry. Changes: Explain permanent input errors and possible delivery drop without a later dead-letter queue. Queue handling and diagnostics are unchanged. Test Plan: Existing consumer and SQL queue unit tests and consumer integration tests. Formatting, lint, and dependency checks. Revert Plan: Remove the comment; existing queue handling remains unchanged.
sbalabanov
force-pushed
the
wt/sqc010-envelope-retention
branch
from
November 13, 2026 20:48
94f949f to
83a7174
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TL;DR: Explain why bad queue information is logged and rejected, not retried.
Summary
This is a comment-only clarification of the existing policy: invalid queue information is logged and rejected, not retried. The same bad input will not repair itself, so any follow-up is an operator decision. With no later dead-letter queue, rejection may mark the delivery finished and discard it.
Repro
Tenant=tenant-aandqueue_name=tenant-b.Test Plan
Checked with the existing tests:
Revert Plan
Remove the comment; existing message handling stays the same.
Issues